VTI vs YLDE
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF
Which is better, VTI or YLDE?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. YLDE is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | YLDE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.48% |
| AUM | $690.1B | $173M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 7.02% |
| Holdings | 3,524 | 110 |
| YTD Return | +12.51%Best | +5.28% |
| 1Y Return | +15.23%Best | +7.20% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.50%Best | +16.52% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.31%Best | +10.44% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0% | -33.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,869Best | $16,430 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3% | 32.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | May 22, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 23, 2017 to Oct 1, 2026 (9.4 years).
VTI vs YLDE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.4 years both funds cover.
VTI vs YLDE Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF (YLDE) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year VTI returned +15.23% while YLDE returned +7.20%. Year to date, VTI is up 12.51% versus a gain of 5.28% for YLDE.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +22.50% per year against +16.52% for YLDE; over five years the annualized figures are +12.31% and +10.44% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +10.88%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 14.8% for YLDE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for VTI and -33.3% for YLDE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while YLDE charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $48 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 7.02% for YLDE.
Holdings Overlap
33.4% of VTI's money is in holdings YLDE also owns. 86.0% of YLDE's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Most of YLDE is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
40 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 48 in YLDE, against full books of 3,524 and 110.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 4 positions for YLDE that do not appear in our book for VTI (5.8% of the fund), and 1,110 for VTI that do not appear in YLDE (64.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in YLDE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.40% | 3.08% | 3.32% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.29% | 2.11% | 4.18% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.79% | 3.48% | 1.31% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.90% | 3.39% | 0.49% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.89% | 4.70% | 3.81% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.56% | 1.98% | 0.58% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 0.12% | 4.31% | 4.19% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.70% | 1.85% | 0.15% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.31% | 2.08% | 0.77% |
| APOAthene (Ath) / Apollo Global Management (Apo) | 0.07% | 2.90% | 2.83% |
86.0% of YLDE is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or YLDE?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YLDE charges 0.48%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VTI or YLDE?
Over the past year VTI returned +15.23% vs +7.20% for YLDE, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), VTI annualized +13.59% vs +10.88% for YLDE. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or YLDE?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 14.8% for YLDE. Worst drawdown: VTI -35.0% vs YLDE -33.3%.
Should I hold both VTI and YLDE?
VTI and YLDE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and YLDE?
86.0% of YLDE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 86.0% of YLDE's is in holdings VTI also owns. They hold 40 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 48 in YLDE.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or YLDE?
VTI yields 1.03% while YLDE yields 7.02%, so YLDE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is YLDE better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. YLDE is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.