QQQ vs XUDV
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Franklin US Dividend Booster Index ETF
Which is better, QQQ or XUDV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
XUDV has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over the full window, XUDV over 1Y. XUDV is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | XUDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $483.5B | $82M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 3.23% |
| Holdings | 107 | 96 |
| YTD Return | +21.71% | +22.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | +25.89% | +26.25%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.80% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.67% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 11.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -16.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $14,169Best | $13,424 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 44.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jan 21, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 23, 2025 to Sep 25, 2026 (1.7 years).
QQQ vs XUDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs XUDV Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Franklin US Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +25.89% while XUDV returned +26.25%. Year to date, QQQ is up 21.71% versus a gain of 22.06% for XUDV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 11.3% for XUDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -16.0% for XUDV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while XUDV charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $9 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 3.23% for XUDV.
Holdings Overlap
12.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings XUDV also owns. 16.7% of XUDV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
XUDV and QQQ share little of their money.
17 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 92 in XUDV, against full books of 107 and 96.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 74 positions for XUDV that do not appear in our book for QQQ (82.9% of the fund), and 79 for QQQ that do not appear in XUDV (85.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in XUDV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.43% | 0.50% | 3.93% |
| KHCKraft Heinz Co. | 0.13% | 4.75% | 4.62% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 0.19% | 4.60% | 4.41% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 0.88% | 1.20% | 0.32% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 0.28% | 1.33% | 1.05% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 0.39% | 0.98% | 0.59% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 1.12% | 0.08% | 1.04% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.97% | 0.12% | 0.85% |
| MCHPMicrochip Technology Inc. | 0.19% | 0.88% | 0.69% |
| STXSeagate Technology Holdings Plc | 0.83% | 0.19% | 0.64% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and XUDV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or XUDV?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while XUDV charges 0.09%. XUDV is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or XUDV?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.89% vs +26.25% for XUDV, so XUDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +22.75% vs +18.91% for XUDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or XUDV?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 11.3% for XUDV. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs XUDV -16.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and XUDV?
QQQ and XUDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and XUDV?
16.7% of XUDV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 16.7% of XUDV's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 92 in XUDV.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or XUDV?
QQQ yields 0.44% while XUDV yields 3.23%, so XUDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XUDV better than QQQ?
XUDV has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over the full window, XUDV over 1Y. XUDV is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.