VYM vs XYLG
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Which is better, VYM or XYLG?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, XYLG over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VYM | XYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04%Best | 0.35% |
| AUM | $81.6B | $62M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.22% | 12.87% |
| Holdings | 613 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +13.91%Best | +11.36% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | +18.06%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.12%Best | +16.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.17%Best | +10.34% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 12.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.8%Best | -21.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,758Best | $16,356 |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.9%Best | 38.7% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2006 | Sep 18, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 21, 2020 to Sep 11, 2026 (6 years).
VYM vs XYLG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6 years both funds cover.
VYM vs XYLG Performance
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year VYM returned +17.57% while XYLG returned +18.06%. Year to date, VYM is up 13.91% versus a gain of 11.36% for XYLG.
Over three years, VYM compounded at +18.12% per year against +16.81% for XYLG; over five years the annualized figures are +12.17% and +10.34% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +15.67% annualized vs +13.11%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.8% compared with 12.0% for XYLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.8% for VYM and -21.3% for XYLG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VYM charges 0.04% per year while XYLG charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $35 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.22% against 12.87% for XYLG.
Holdings Overlap
88.0% of VYM's money is in holdings XYLG also owns. 34.1% of XYLG's money is in holdings VYM also owns.
Most of VYM is already inside XYLG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
239 positions in common, counted across the 603 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 489 in XYLG, against full books of 613 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 245 positions for XYLG that do not appear in our book for VYM (66.7% of the fund), and 331 for VYM that do not appear in XYLG (9.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VYM | Weight in XYLG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 7.29% | 3.03% | 4.26% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 3.38% | 1.46% | 1.92% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 2.54% | 0.94% | 1.60% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 2.36% | 0.98% | 1.38% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.93% | 0.73% | 1.20% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 2.01% | 0.61% | 1.40% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.85% | 0.66% | 1.19% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 1.56% | 0.62% | 0.94% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Inc. | 1.56% | 0.57% | 0.99% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 1.46% | 0.53% | 0.93% |
88.0% of VYM is already inside XYLG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VYM or XYLG?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while XYLG charges 0.35%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VYM or XYLG?
Over the past year VYM returned +17.57% vs +18.06% for XYLG, so XYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), VYM annualized +15.67% vs +13.11% for XYLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VYM or XYLG?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 13.8% annualized versus 12.0% for XYLG. Worst drawdown: VYM -15.8% vs XYLG -21.3%.
Should I hold both VYM and XYLG?
VYM and XYLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VYM and XYLG?
88.0% of VYM's money is in holdings XYLG also owns. 34.1% of XYLG's is in holdings VYM also owns. They hold 239 positions in common, counted across the 603 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 489 in XYLG.
Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or XYLG?
VYM yields 2.22% while XYLG yields 12.87%, so XYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XYLG better than VYM?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, XYLG over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.