ABLD vs RFDA
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs ALPS Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
Which is better, ABLD or RFDA?
RFDA has been ahead.
ABLD has a lower expense ratio. RFDA led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. RFDA is less concentrated, with 26.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | RFDA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.52% |
| AUM | $99M | $78M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.37% | 1.85% |
| Holdings | 51 | 77 |
| YTD Return | +8.40% | +15.04%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.95% | +17.12%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.74% | +20.67%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.35% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4%Tie | -19.4%Tie |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $16,495 | $17,782Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.5% | 26.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | ALPS Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | Jun 6, 2016 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 14, 2021 to Oct 12, 2026 (4.8 years).
ABLD vs RFDA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
ABLD vs RFDA Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and ALPS Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors. Over the past year ABLD returned +12.95% while RFDA returned +17.12%. Year to date, ABLD is up 8.40% versus a gain of 15.04% for RFDA.
Over three years, ABLD compounded at +9.74% per year against +20.67% for RFDA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 14.6% for RFDA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for ABLD and -19.4% for RFDA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while RFDA charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $52 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 3.37% against 1.85% for RFDA.
Holdings Overlap
4.3% of ABLD's money is in holdings RFDA also owns. 2.7% of RFDA's money is in holdings ABLD also owns.
ABLD and RFDA share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 76 in RFDA, against full books of 51 and 77.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 71 positions for RFDA that do not appear in our book for ABLD (90.4% of the fund), and 30 for ABLD that do not appear in RFDA (63.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABLD and RFDA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or RFDA?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while RFDA charges 0.52%. ABLD is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLD or RFDA?
Over the past year ABLD returned +12.95% vs +17.12% for RFDA, so RFDA leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLD or RFDA?
ABLD has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 14.6% for RFDA. Worst drawdown: ABLD -19.4% vs RFDA -19.4%.
Should I hold both ABLD and RFDA?
ABLD and RFDA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLD and RFDA?
4.3% of ABLD's money is in holdings RFDA also owns. 2.7% of RFDA's is in holdings ABLD also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 76 in RFDA.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or RFDA?
ABLD yields 3.37% while RFDA yields 1.85%, so ABLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RFDA better than ABLD?
ABLD has a lower expense ratio. RFDA led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. RFDA is less concentrated, with 26.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.