ACGR vs IVV
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ACGR or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACGR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.12% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 94 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +6.39% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.65% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.22% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.24% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.3% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.5% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,282 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.4% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2021 to Sep 4, 2026 (5.2 years).
ACGR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.
ACGR vs IVV Performance
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) is an ETF from American Century Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ACGR returned +10.65% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, ACGR is up 6.39% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, ACGR compounded at +18.22% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.24% and +12.88% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.3% compared with 15.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.5% for ACGR and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACGR charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACGR currently yields 0.12% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
90.8% of ACGR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 50.5% of IVV's money is in holdings ACGR also owns.
Most of ACGR is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
70 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in ACGR and 505 in IVV, against full books of 94 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 427 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ACGR (48.9% of the fund), and 19 for ACGR that do not appear in IVV (5.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACGR | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 13.38% | 7.98% | 5.40% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 11.90% | 3.19% | 8.71% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.61% | 6.86% | 3.25% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 4.90% | 5.44% | 0.54% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.72% | 2.98% | 2.74% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.00% | 4.01% | 2.01% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.97% | 1.39% | 1.58% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.04% | 1.94% | 0.10% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.14% | 0.69% | 2.45% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 2.46% | 1.36% | 1.10% |
90.8% of ACGR is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACGR or IVV?
ACGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACGR or IVV?
Over the past year ACGR returned +10.65% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACGR or IVV?
ACGR has been the more volatile fund at 19.3% annualized versus 15.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ACGR -34.5% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both ACGR and IVV?
ACGR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACGR and IVV?
90.8% of ACGR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 50.5% of IVV's is in holdings ACGR also owns. They hold 70 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in ACGR and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACGR or IVV?
ACGR yields 0.12% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ACGR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.