ACGR vs VTI
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ACGR or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACGR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.12% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 94 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +3.74% | +11.53%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.81% | +15.74%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.03% | +20.67%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.87% | +11.59%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.4% | 15.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.5% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,010 | $17,303Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.4% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2021 to Sep 15, 2026 (5.2 years).
ACGR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.
ACGR vs VTI Performance
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) is an ETF from American Century Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACGR returned +4.81% while VTI returned +15.74%. Year to date, ACGR is up 3.74% versus a gain of 11.53% for VTI.
Over three years, ACGR compounded at +18.03% per year against +20.67% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.87% and +11.59% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 15.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.5% for ACGR and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACGR charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACGR currently yields 0.12% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
97.1% of ACGR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 45.1% of VTI's money is in holdings ACGR also owns.
Most of ACGR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
88 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in ACGR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 94 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,063 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ACGR (52.4% of the fund), and 2 for ACGR that do not appear in VTI (0.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACGR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 13.38% | 6.40% | 6.98% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 11.90% | 2.90% | 9.00% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.61% | 6.29% | 2.68% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.90% | 4.79% | 0.11% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.72% | 2.56% | 3.16% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.00% | 3.65% | 1.65% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.97% | 1.35% | 1.62% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.14% | 0.63% | 2.51% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.04% | 1.70% | 0.34% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.46% | 1.22% | 1.24% |
97.1% of ACGR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACGR or VTI?
ACGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACGR or VTI?
Over the past year ACGR returned +4.81% vs +15.74% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACGR or VTI?
ACGR has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 15.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ACGR -34.5% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both ACGR and VTI?
ACGR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACGR and VTI?
97.1% of ACGR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 45.1% of VTI's is in holdings ACGR also owns. They hold 88 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in ACGR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACGR or VTI?
ACGR yields 0.12% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ACGR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.