ACIO vs GGTL
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF vs Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF
Which is better, ACIO or GGTL?
Each has led over a different period.
GGTL has a lower expense ratio. ACIO led over 1Y and the full window, GGTL over 3Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIO | GGTL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.00%Best |
| AUM | $2.3B | $13M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.39% | 0.90% |
| Holdings | 527 | 148 |
| YTD Return | +4.46%Best | +2.55% |
| 1Y Return | +5.17%Best | +4.39% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.03% | +15.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.02% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.4%Best | 19.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.8%Best | -23.6% |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $14,572Best | $13,670 |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | Gabelli Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 9, 2019 | Jan 5, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 5, 2022 to Nov 6, 2026 (4.8 years).
ACIO vs GGTL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
ACIO vs GGTL Performance
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF (ACIO) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds. Over the past year ACIO returned +5.17% while GGTL returned +4.39%. Year to date, ACIO is up 4.46% versus a gain of 2.55% for GGTL.
Over three years, ACIO compounded at +14.03% per year against +15.01% for GGTL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 10.4% for ACIO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.8% for ACIO and -23.6% for GGTL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIO charges 0.79% per year while GGTL charges 0.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $0 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIO currently yields 0.39% against 0.90% for GGTL.
Holdings Overlap
At least 28.0% of ACIO's money is in holdings GGTL also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GGTL, our book for it covers 88.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
ACIO and GGTL share little of their money.
19 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 71 in GGTL, against full books of 527 and 148.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIO | Weight in GGTL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.90% | 2.32% | 5.58% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.01% | 2.04% | 3.97% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.47% | 4.13% | 2.66% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.46% | 2.57% | 0.11% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.76% | 0.89% | 2.87% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 0.34% | 3.13% | 2.79% |
| ANETArista Networks, Inc | 0.34% | 2.87% | 2.53% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.62% | 1.55% | 0.07% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.40% | 2.01% | 1.61% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 0.18% | 1.97% | 1.79% |
28.0% of ACIO is already inside GGTL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIO or GGTL?
ACIO has an expense ratio of 0.79% while GGTL charges 0.00%. GGTL is the cheaper option, by $79 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACIO or GGTL?
Over the past year ACIO returned +5.17% vs +4.39% for GGTL, so ACIO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACIO or GGTL?
GGTL has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 10.4% for ACIO. Worst drawdown: ACIO -12.8% vs GGTL -23.6%.
Should I hold both ACIO and GGTL?
ACIO and GGTL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACIO and GGTL?
At least 28.0% of ACIO's money is in holdings GGTL also owns. Our book for GGTL is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 71 in GGTL.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIO or GGTL?
ACIO yields 0.39% while GGTL yields 0.90%, so GGTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GGTL better than ACIO?
GGTL has a lower expense ratio. ACIO led over 1Y and the full window, GGTL over 3Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.