AFGR vs VOO
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AFGR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $91M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 76 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.17% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.46% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.67% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.54% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 20, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
AFGR vs VOO Performance
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF (AFGR) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AFGR returned +9.46% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, AFGR is up 7.17% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, AFGR compounded at +20.67% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.54% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +11.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AFGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for AFGR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AFGR charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AFGR currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
AFGR and VOO share 57 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 43.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AFGR or VOO?
AFGR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AFGR or VOO?
Over the past year AFGR returned +9.46% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), AFGR annualized +11.20% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AFGR or VOO?
AFGR has been the more volatile fund at 21.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: AFGR -46.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AFGR and VOO?
AFGR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between AFGR and VOO?
AFGR and VOO share 57 common holdings with a 43.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AFGR or VOO?
AFGR yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.