AGNG vs VYM
Global X Aging Population ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 568 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGNG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $87M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 83 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +6.46% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.09% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.45% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.52% | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 9, 2016 | Nov 10, 2006 |
AGNG vs VYM Performance
Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AGNG returned +18.09% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, AGNG is up 6.46% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, AGNG compounded at +12.45% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +5.52% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, AGNG has the edge at +9.74% annualized vs +7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AGNG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.6% for AGNG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGNG charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGNG currently yields 0.91% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
AGNG and VYM share 6 holdings out of 631 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGNG or VYM?
AGNG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGNG or VYM?
Over the past year AGNG returned +18.09% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), AGNG annualized +9.74% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGNG or VYM?
AGNG has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: AGNG -30.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both AGNG and VYM?
AGNG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AGNG and VYM?
AGNG and VYM share 6 common holdings with a 7.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 631 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGNG or VYM?
AGNG yields 0.91% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.