AGNG vs IVV
Global X Aging Population ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AGNG or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AGNG is less concentrated, with 32.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGNG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $94M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.86% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 91 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +2.18% | +11.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.44% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.36% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.88% | +12.80%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2%Tie | 15.2%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -30.6%Best | -33.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,690 | $18,262Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.8%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 9, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 10, 2016 to Sep 10, 2026 (10.3 years).
AGNG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.3 years both funds cover.
AGNG vs IVV Performance
Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AGNG returned +10.44% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, AGNG is up 2.18% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Over three years, AGNG compounded at +11.36% per year against +20.71% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +4.88% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.14% annualized vs +9.23%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AGNG and IVV have been equally volatile, both at 15.2% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.6% for AGNG and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGNG charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGNG currently yields 0.86% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
46.8% of AGNG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 5.1% of IVV's money is in holdings AGNG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in AGNG and 505 in IVV, against full books of 91 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 477 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for AGNG (94.3% of the fund), and 26 for AGNG that do not appear in IVV (14.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AGNG | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.41% | 1.39% | 2.02% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 3.08% | 0.93% | 2.15% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 3.34% | 0.65% | 2.69% |
| WELLWelltower Inc | 3.27% | 0.25% | 3.02% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 3.19% | 0.33% | 2.86% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 3.04% | 0.48% | 2.56% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 3.23% | 0.20% | 3.03% |
| EWEdwards Lifesciences Corp | 3.29% | 0.08% | 3.21% |
| VTRVentas, Inc. | 3.12% | 0.07% | 3.05% |
| SYKStryker Corp 3.375 11/25 | 2.89% | 0.17% | 2.72% |
46.8% of AGNG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGNG or IVV?
AGNG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AGNG or IVV?
Over the past year AGNG returned +10.44% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), AGNG annualized +9.23% vs +14.14% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AGNG or IVV?
AGNG and IVV have been equally volatile, both at 15.2% annualized. Worst drawdown: AGNG -30.6% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both AGNG and IVV?
AGNG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AGNG and IVV?
46.8% of AGNG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 5.1% of IVV's is in holdings AGNG also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in AGNG and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGNG or IVV?
AGNG yields 0.86% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than AGNG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AGNG is less concentrated, with 32.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.