AGNG vs VTI
Global X Aging Population ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGNG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $94M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.88% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 84 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.56% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.99% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.01% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.72% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 9, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
AGNG vs VTI Performance
Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AGNG returned +17.99% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, AGNG is up 8.56% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, AGNG compounded at +14.01% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.72% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, AGNG has the edge at +9.93% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.2% for AGNG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.6% for AGNG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGNG charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGNG currently yields 0.88% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AGNG and VTI share 28 holdings out of 2830 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGNG or VTI?
AGNG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGNG or VTI?
Over the past year AGNG returned +17.99% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), AGNG annualized +9.93% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGNG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.2% for AGNG. Worst drawdown: AGNG -30.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AGNG and VTI?
AGNG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AGNG and VTI?
AGNG and VTI share 28 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2830 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGNG or VTI?
AGNG yields 0.88% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.