AGNG vs VTI
Global X Aging Population ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, AGNG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGNG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $94M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.86% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 91 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +2.87% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.02% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.20% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.24% | +12.36%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2%Best | 15.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.6%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,909 | $17,908Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3%Tie | 33.3%Tie |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 9, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 10, 2016 to Sep 18, 2026 (10.4 years).
AGNG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.4 years both funds cover.
AGNG vs VTI Performance
Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AGNG returned +11.02% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, AGNG is up 2.87% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, AGNG compounded at +12.20% per year against +21.01% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.24% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.79% annualized vs +9.28%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 15.2% for AGNG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.6% for AGNG and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGNG charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGNG currently yields 0.86% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
59.5% of AGNG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.9% of VTI's money is in holdings AGNG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
42 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in AGNG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 91 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,120 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for AGNG (92.5% of the fund), and 2 for AGNG that do not appear in VTI (2.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AGNG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.44% | 1.35% | 2.09% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 3.47% | 0.61% | 2.86% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 3.18% | 0.86% | 2.32% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 3.47% | 0.45% | 3.02% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 3.49% | 0.29% | 3.20% |
| WELLWelltower, Inc. | 3.30% | 0.23% | 3.07% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 3.19% | 0.18% | 3.01% |
| EWEdwards Lifesciences Corp | 3.24% | 0.07% | 3.17% |
| REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 3.05% | 0.11% | 2.94% |
| VTRVentas Inc . | 3.07% | 0.06% | 3.01% |
59.5% of AGNG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGNG or VTI?
AGNG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AGNG or VTI?
Over the past year AGNG returned +11.02% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), AGNG annualized +9.28% vs +13.79% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AGNG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 15.2% for AGNG. Worst drawdown: AGNG -30.6% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both AGNG and VTI?
AGNG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AGNG and VTI?
59.5% of AGNG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.9% of VTI's is in holdings AGNG also owns. They hold 42 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in AGNG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGNG or VTI?
AGNG yields 0.86% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than AGNG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.