AGNG vs SPY
Global X Aging Population ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGNG | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $94M | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.88% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 84 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +7.94% | +12.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.35% | +20.83% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.75% | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.71% | +12.98% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 9, 2016 | Jan 22, 1993 |
AGNG vs SPY Performance
Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year AGNG returned +17.35% while SPY returned +20.83%. Year to date, AGNG is up 7.94% versus a gain of 12.22% for SPY.
Over three years, AGNG compounded at +13.75% per year against +21.70% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +5.71% and +12.98% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, AGNG has the edge at +9.87% annualized vs +8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.2% for AGNG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.6% for AGNG and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGNG charges 0.50% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $9 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGNG currently yields 0.88% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
AGNG and SPY share 12 holdings out of 563 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGNG or SPY?
AGNG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGNG or SPY?
Over the past year AGNG returned +17.35% vs +20.83% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), AGNG annualized +9.87% vs +8.79% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGNG or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.2% for AGNG. Worst drawdown: AGNG -30.6% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both AGNG and SPY?
AGNG and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AGNG and SPY?
AGNG and SPY share 12 common holdings with a 2.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 563 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGNG or SPY?
AGNG yields 0.88% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.