AGNG vs VOO
Global X Aging Population ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGNG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $87M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 83 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +6.26% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.63% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.39% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.69% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 9, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
AGNG vs VOO Performance
Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AGNG returned +19.63% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, AGNG is up 6.26% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, AGNG compounded at +12.39% per year against +21.55% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +5.69% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +9.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AGNG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.6% for AGNG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGNG charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGNG currently yields 0.91% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
AGNG and VOO share 18 holdings out of 566 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGNG or VOO?
AGNG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGNG or VOO?
Over the past year AGNG returned +19.63% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), AGNG annualized +9.72% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGNG or VOO?
AGNG has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: AGNG -30.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AGNG and VOO?
AGNG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AGNG and VOO?
AGNG and VOO share 18 common holdings with a 5.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 566 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGNG or VOO?
AGNG yields 0.91% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.