AIEQ vs THRO
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF vs iShares US Thematic Rotation Active ETF
Which is better, AIEQ or THRO?
THRO has been ahead.
THRO has a lower expense ratio. THRO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AIEQ is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AIEQ | THRO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.57%Best |
| AUM | $108M | $7.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.40% | 0.30% |
| Holdings | 329 | 500 |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +11.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.91% | +11.15%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.15% | +21.87%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.82% | +12.31%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.4% | 17.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.1% | -26.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,492 | $17,869Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.5%Best | 43.7% |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | BlackRock, Inc. (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 17, 2017 | Dec 14, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 16, 2021 to Nov 11, 2026 (4.9 years).
AIEQ vs THRO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.9 years both funds cover.
AIEQ vs THRO Performance
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and iShares US Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US). Over the past year AIEQ returned +7.91% while THRO returned +11.15%. Year to date, AIEQ is up 7.98% versus a gain of 11.21% for THRO.
Over three years, AIEQ compounded at +18.15% per year against +21.87% for THRO; over five years the annualized figures are +2.82% and +12.31% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AIEQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 17.4% for THRO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.1% for AIEQ and -26.5% for THRO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AIEQ charges 0.75% per year while THRO charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $57 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIEQ currently yields 0.40% against 0.30% for THRO.
Holdings Overlap
47.1% of AIEQ's money is in holdings THRO also owns. 65.2% of THRO's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
69 positions in common, counted across the 161 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 247 in THRO, against full books of 329 and 500.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 102 positions for THRO that do not appear in our book for AIEQ (34.0% of the fund), and 92 for AIEQ that do not appear in THRO (52.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AIEQ | Weight in THRO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.71% | 8.35% | 4.64% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 9.02% | 2.11% | 6.91% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 1.27% | 8.36% | 7.09% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.26% | 6.53% | 4.27% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.28% | 4.58% | 3.30% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 1.51% | 3.89% | 2.38% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.82% | 1.91% | 0.91% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 3.78% | 0.76% | 3.02% |
| GEVGE Vernova Inc. CDR (CAD Hedged) | 3.50% | 0.29% | 3.21% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 3.73% | 0.04% | 3.69% |
65.2% of THRO is already inside AIEQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AIEQ or THRO?
AIEQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while THRO charges 0.57%. THRO is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AIEQ or THRO?
Over the past year AIEQ returned +7.91% vs +11.15% for THRO, so THRO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AIEQ or THRO?
AIEQ has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 17.4% for THRO. Worst drawdown: AIEQ -36.1% vs THRO -26.5%.
Should I hold both AIEQ and THRO?
AIEQ and THRO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AIEQ and THRO?
65.2% of THRO's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns. 65.2% of THRO's is in holdings AIEQ also owns. They hold 69 positions in common, counted across the 161 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 247 in THRO.
Which pays a higher dividend, AIEQ or THRO?
AIEQ yields 0.40% while THRO yields 0.30%, so AIEQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is THRO better than AIEQ?
THRO has a lower expense ratio. THRO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AIEQ is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.