ALTL vs VOO
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ALTL | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $92M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.85% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +10.59% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.73% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.46% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.88% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.0% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ALTL vs VOO Performance
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ALTL returned +17.73% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, ALTL is up 10.59% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, ALTL compounded at +9.46% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +2.88% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +12.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ALTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.9% for ALTL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ALTL charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ALTL currently yields 0.85% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ALTL and VOO share 99 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ALTL or VOO?
ALTL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ALTL or VOO?
Over the past year ALTL returned +17.73% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ALTL annualized +12.78% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ALTL or VOO?
ALTL has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ALTL -31.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ALTL and VOO?
ALTL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ALTL and VOO?
ALTL and VOO share 99 common holdings with a 22.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ALTL or VOO?
ALTL yields 0.85% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.