ANEW vs IVV
MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ANEW | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 148 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +7.67% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.49% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.90% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.08% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
ANEW vs IVV Performance
MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) is a ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ANEW returned +7.49% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, ANEW is up 7.67% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, ANEW compounded at +15.90% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +4.08% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +5.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ANEW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.9% for ANEW and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ANEW charges 0.45% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANEW currently yields 0.53% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ANEW and IVV share 59 holdings out of 593 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ANEW or IVV?
ANEW has an expense ratio of 0.45% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ANEW or IVV?
Over the past year ANEW returned +7.49% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ANEW annualized +5.96% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ANEW or IVV?
ANEW has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ANEW -39.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ANEW and IVV?
ANEW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ANEW and IVV?
ANEW and IVV share 59 common holdings with a 25.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 593 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ANEW or IVV?
ANEW yields 0.53% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.