ANEW vs VTI
MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ANEW or VTI?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. ANEW is less concentrated, with 22.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ANEW | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $8M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 148 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +7.43% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.83% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.77% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.91% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.9% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,708 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.4%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 16, 2020 to Oct 2, 2026 (6 years).
ANEW vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6 years both funds cover.
ANEW vs VTI Performance
MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ANEW returned +3.83% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, ANEW is up 7.43% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, ANEW compounded at +17.77% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.91% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +15.03% annualized vs +5.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ANEW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.9% for ANEW and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ANEW charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANEW currently yields 0.50% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
74.3% of ANEW's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 42.9% of VTI's money is in holdings ANEW also owns.
Most of ANEW is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
109 positions in common, counted across the 146 positions we hold weights for in ANEW and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 148 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,044 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ANEW (54.5% of the fund), and 2 for ANEW that do not appear in VTI (0.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ANEW | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.10% | 6.29% | 4.19% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.80% | 6.40% | 4.60% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.28% | 4.79% | 2.51% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.84% | 3.65% | 1.81% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.70% | 2.90% | 1.20% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.58% | 2.56% | 0.98% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.07% | 1.70% | 0.37% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.09% | 1.35% | 0.74% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.31% | 0.61% | 1.70% |
| DASHDoordash Inc - A | 2.48% | 0.10% | 2.38% |
74.3% of ANEW is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ANEW or VTI?
ANEW has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ANEW or VTI?
Over the past year ANEW returned +3.83% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ANEW annualized +5.80% vs +15.03% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ANEW or VTI?
ANEW has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ANEW -39.9% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both ANEW and VTI?
ANEW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ANEW and VTI?
74.3% of ANEW's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 42.9% of VTI's is in holdings ANEW also owns. They hold 109 positions in common, counted across the 146 positions we hold weights for in ANEW and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ANEW or VTI?
ANEW yields 0.50% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ANEW?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. ANEW is less concentrated, with 22.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.