ANEW vs VTI
MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ANEW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 148 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +7.67% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.49% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.90% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.08% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
ANEW vs VTI Performance
MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ANEW returned +7.49% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, ANEW is up 7.67% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, ANEW compounded at +15.90% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.08% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +5.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ANEW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.9% for ANEW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ANEW charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANEW currently yields 0.53% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ANEW and VTI share 99 holdings out of 2835 unique holdings combined, representing a 24.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ANEW or VTI?
ANEW has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ANEW or VTI?
Over the past year ANEW returned +7.49% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ANEW annualized +5.96% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ANEW or VTI?
ANEW has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ANEW -39.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ANEW and VTI?
ANEW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ANEW and VTI?
ANEW and VTI share 99 common holdings with a 24.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2835 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ANEW or VTI?
ANEW yields 0.53% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.