AOD vs FNGG
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF
Quick Verdict
FNGG has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. AOD offers more diversification with 86 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | FNGG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.97% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $143M | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.73% | 10.70% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 18 | |
| YTD Return | +17.81% | +27.62% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.80% | +28.50% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.69% | +59.46% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.12% | +3.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 58.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -91.3% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Sep 29, 2021 |
AOD vs FNGG Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF (FNGG) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year AOD returned +30.80% while FNGG returned +28.50%. Year to date, AOD is up 17.81% versus a gain of 27.62% for FNGG.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +23.69% per year against +59.46% for FNGG; over five years the annualized figures are +11.12% and +3.45% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, FNGG has the edge at +3.45% annualized vs -4.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.3% compared with 21.9% for AOD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -91.3% for FNGG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while FNGG charges 0.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $97 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.73% against 10.70% for FNGG.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and FNGG share 3 holdings out of 95 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or FNGG?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while FNGG charges 0.97%. FNGG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $19 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or FNGG?
Over the past year AOD returned +30.80% vs +28.50% for FNGG, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), AOD annualized -4.05% vs +3.45% for FNGG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or FNGG?
FNGG has been the more volatile fund at 58.3% annualized versus 21.9% for AOD. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs FNGG -91.3%.
Should I hold both AOD and FNGG?
AOD and FNGG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and FNGG?
AOD and FNGG share 3 common holdings with a 9.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 95 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or FNGG?
AOD yields 11.73% while FNGG yields 10.70%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.