BDIV vs VYM

BDIV vs VYM

Which is better, BDIV or VYM?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.4%.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBDIVVYM
Expense Ratio0.49%0.04%Best
AUM$7M$81.6B
Dividend Yield1.04%2.22%
Holdings39613
YTD Return+7.34%+11.35%Best
1Y Return+11.15%+15.34%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.22%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.30%
Volatility (annualized)11.0%10.3%Best
Max Drawdown-15.0%-14.5%Best
$10,000 over 2.1 years$13,138$13,433Best
Top 10 Weight42.4%26.1%Best
Fund FamilyAdvisors Asset Management, Inc.Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionJul 30, 2024Nov 10, 2006

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 31, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.1 years).

BDIV vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.

BDIV vs VYM Performance

AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) is an ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc. and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BDIV returned +11.15% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, BDIV is up 7.34% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BDIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.0% compared with 10.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for BDIV and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BDIV charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BDIV currently yields 1.04% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

BDIV already in VYM47.9%
VYM already in BDIV23.7%

47.9% of BDIV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 23.7% of VYM's money is in holdings BDIV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

19 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in BDIV and 557 in VYM, against full books of 39 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 510 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for BDIV (73.7% of the fund), and 16 for BDIV that do not appear in VYM (48.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BDIVWeight in VYMDifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.99%7.35%2.36%
JPMJpmorgan Chase4.03%3.82%0.21%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common3.26%2.51%0.75%
CVXChevron Corp3.55%1.48%2.07%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.3.31%1.21%2.10%
MSMorgan Stanley2.98%0.96%2.02%
LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares2.46%0.90%1.56%
UNPUnion Pacific Corp2.65%0.70%1.95%
NEENextera Energy Inc2.46%0.74%1.72%
TRGPTarga Resources Partners Lp/targa Resources Partners Finance Corp.2.60%0.23%2.37%

47.9% of BDIV is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BDIVVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BDIV or VYM?

BDIV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BDIV or VYM?

Over the past year BDIV returned +11.15% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BDIV annualized +13.88% vs +15.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BDIV or VYM?

BDIV has been the more volatile fund at 11.0% annualized versus 10.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BDIV -15.0% vs VYM -14.5%.

Should I hold both BDIV and VYM?

BDIV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between BDIV and VYM?

47.9% of BDIV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 23.7% of VYM's is in holdings BDIV also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in BDIV and 557 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, BDIV or VYM?

BDIV yields 1.04% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than BDIV?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.