BDIV vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBDIVVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.49%0.04%
AUM$6M$79.0B
Dividend Yield1.06%2.86%
Holdings38568
YTD Return+11.17%+15.80%
1Y Return+20.55%+26.12%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.25%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.51%
Volatility (annualized)11.0%14.6%
Max Drawdown-15.0%-58.8%
Fund FamilyAdvisors Asset Management, Inc.Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 30, 2024Nov 10, 2006

BDIV vs VYM Performance

AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc. and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BDIV returned +20.55% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, BDIV is up 11.17% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 11.0% for BDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for BDIV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BDIV charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BDIV currently yields 1.06% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

19.2%overlap

BDIV and VYM share 16 holdings out of 579 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BDIVWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO2.85%6.47%3.62%
JPM:US3.69%3.36%0.33%
JNJ3.06%2.62%0.44%
CVXProProPro
PMProProPro
MSProProPro
NEEProProPro
LOWProProPro
UNPProProPro
UNHProProPro
See all 10 holdings BDIV shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BDIV or VYM?

BDIV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.

Which performed better, BDIV or VYM?

Over the past year BDIV returned +20.55% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BDIV annualized +16.74% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, BDIV or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 11.0% for BDIV. Worst drawdown: BDIV -15.0% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both BDIV and VYM?

BDIV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between BDIV and VYM?

BDIV and VYM share 16 common holdings with a 19.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 579 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, BDIV or VYM?

BDIV yields 1.06% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →