BDIV vs SPY
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BDIV | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $7M | $814.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.05% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 39 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +10.10% | +13.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.46% | +21.44% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8% | 15.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | Jan 22, 1993 |
BDIV vs SPY Performance
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc. and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year BDIV returned +17.46% while SPY returned +21.44%. Year to date, BDIV is up 10.10% versus a gain of 13.78% for SPY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 10.8% for BDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for BDIV and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BDIV charges 0.49% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $9 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BDIV currently yields 1.05% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
BDIV and SPY share 33 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 28.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BDIV or SPY?
BDIV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BDIV or SPY?
Over the past year BDIV returned +17.46% vs +21.44% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BDIV annualized +15.56% vs +8.83% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BDIV or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 10.8% for BDIV. Worst drawdown: BDIV -15.0% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both BDIV and SPY?
BDIV and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BDIV and SPY?
BDIV and SPY share 33 common holdings with a 28.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BDIV or SPY?
BDIV yields 1.05% while SPY yields 1.01%, so BDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.