BDIV vs IVV
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BDIV or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BDIV | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.04% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 39 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +7.08% | +13.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.77% | +17.38%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.67% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.13% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.0%Best | 12.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.0%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $13,078 | $14,209Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.4% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 31, 2024 to Sep 24, 2026 (2.1 years).
BDIV vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
BDIV vs IVV Performance
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) is an ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc. and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BDIV returned +9.77% while IVV returned +17.38%. Year to date, BDIV is up 7.08% versus a gain of 13.23% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.1% compared with 11.0% for BDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for BDIV and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BDIV charges 0.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BDIV currently yields 1.04% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
89.2% of BDIV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 29.2% of IVV's money is in holdings BDIV also owns.
Most of BDIV is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
32 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in BDIV and 490 in IVV, against full books of 39 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 450 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BDIV (69.5% of the fund), and 2 for BDIV that do not appear in IVV (5.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BDIV | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.72% | 7.02% | 1.30% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.89% | 5.69% | 1.20% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.99% | 2.65% | 2.34% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.03% | 3.00% | 1.03% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.03% | 1.44% | 2.59% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.97% | 1.38% | 1.59% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 3.26% | 0.97% | 2.29% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 3.55% | 0.58% | 2.97% |
| TTTt Trane Technologies Plc | 3.65% | 0.15% | 3.50% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 3.31% | 0.44% | 2.87% |
89.2% of BDIV is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BDIV or IVV?
BDIV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BDIV or IVV?
Over the past year BDIV returned +9.77% vs +17.38% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BDIV annualized +13.63% vs +18.21% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BDIV or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.1% annualized versus 11.0% for BDIV. Worst drawdown: BDIV -15.0% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both BDIV and IVV?
BDIV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BDIV and IVV?
89.2% of BDIV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 29.2% of IVV's is in holdings BDIV also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in BDIV and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BDIV or IVV?
BDIV yields 1.04% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BDIV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.