BDIV vs QQQ
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 107 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BDIV | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $7M | $486.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.05% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 39 | 107 | |
| YTD Return | +10.10% | +17.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.46% | +26.50% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.58% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.15% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BDIV vs QQQ Performance
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc. and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BDIV returned +17.46% while QQQ returned +26.50%. Year to date, BDIV is up 10.10% versus a gain of 17.33% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 10.8% for BDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for BDIV and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BDIV charges 0.49% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $18 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BDIV currently yields 1.05% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BDIV and QQQ share 10 holdings out of 129 unique holdings combined, representing a 24.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BDIV or QQQ?
BDIV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BDIV or QQQ?
Over the past year BDIV returned +17.46% vs +26.50% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BDIV annualized +15.56% vs +13.04% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BDIV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 10.8% for BDIV. Worst drawdown: BDIV -15.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BDIV and QQQ?
BDIV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BDIV and QQQ?
BDIV and QQQ share 10 common holdings with a 24.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 129 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BDIV or QQQ?
BDIV yields 1.05% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.