BUYB vs IVV

BUYB vs IVV

Which is better, BUYB or IVV?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. BUYB is less concentrated, with 15.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.8%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: BUYB

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBUYBIVV
Expense Ratio0.39%0.03%Best
AUM$28M$850.0B
Dividend Yield0.28%1.09%
Holdings2051,018
YTD Return+13.89%Best+12.12%
1Y Return-+12.53%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.54%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.93%
Top 10 Weight15.6%Best38.8%
Fund FamilyProSharesiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 6, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BUYB vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BUYB vs IVV Performance

ProShares S&P 500 Buyback Aristocrats ETF (BUYB) is an ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BUYB is up 13.89% versus a gain of 12.12% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BUYB charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUYB currently yields 0.28% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

BUYB already in IVV97.8%
IVV already in BUYB18.7%

97.8% of BUYB's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 18.7% of IVV's money is in holdings BUYB also owns.

Most of BUYB is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

67 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in BUYB and 505 in IVV, against full books of 205 and 1,018.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 432 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BUYB (80.9% of the fund), and 1 for BUYB that do not appear in IVV (1.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BUYBWeight in IVVDifference
AAPLApple Inc1.43%7.51%6.08%
LLYEli Lilly & Co1.47%1.45%0.02%
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.43%1.34%0.09%
VVisa Inc Class A1.52%1.00%0.52%
WMTWalmart Inc1.55%0.78%0.77%
MAMastercard Inc1.52%0.73%0.79%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares1.28%0.67%0.61%
MCKMckesson Corp.1.56%0.17%1.39%
MCDMcdonald'S Corp1.48%0.25%1.23%
UNPUnion Pacific Corp1.47%0.26%1.21%

97.8% of BUYB is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BUYBIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BUYB or IVV?

BUYB has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BUYB and IVV?

97.8% of BUYB's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 18.7% of IVV's is in holdings BUYB also owns. They hold 67 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in BUYB and 505 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, BUYB or IVV?

BUYB yields 0.28% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than BUYB?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. BUYB is less concentrated, with 15.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.