BUYB vs VOO

BUYB vs VOO

Which is better, BUYB or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. BUYB is less concentrated, with 16.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: BUYB

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBUYBVOO
Expense Ratio0.39%0.03%Best
AUM$22M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.11%1.04%
Holdings68509
YTD Return+6.66%+12.50%Best
1Y Return-+17.58%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.95%
Top 10 Weight16.7%Best36.4%
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 6, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BUYB vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BUYB vs VOO Performance

ProShares S&P 500 Buyback Aristocrats ETF (BUYB) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BUYB is up 6.66% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BUYB charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUYB currently yields 0.11% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

BUYB already in VOO96.8%
VOO already in BUYB18.2%

96.8% of BUYB's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 18.2% of VOO's money is in holdings BUYB also owns.

Most of BUYB is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

66 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in BUYB and 505 in VOO, against full books of 68 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 429 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for BUYB (81.2% of the fund), and 0 for BUYB that do not appear in VOO (1.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BUYBWeight in VOODifference
AAPLApple, Inc1.37%6.59%5.22%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.33%1.47%0.14%
JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co.1.50%1.26%0.24%
VVisa Inc1.46%0.87%0.59%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares1.47%0.72%0.75%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.1.29%0.89%0.40%
MAMastercard Inc1.52%0.64%0.88%
WMTWalmart, Inc.1.37%0.77%0.60%
CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A1.82%0.03%1.79%
PYPLPaypal Holdings Inc1.80%0.05%1.75%

96.8% of BUYB is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BUYBVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BUYB or VOO?

BUYB has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BUYB and VOO?

96.8% of BUYB's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 18.2% of VOO's is in holdings BUYB also owns. They hold 66 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in BUYB and 505 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, BUYB or VOO?

BUYB yields 0.11% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than BUYB?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. BUYB is less concentrated, with 16.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.