CATH vs QQQ
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. CATH offers more diversification with 447 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CATH | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.77% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 447 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +11.02% | +16.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.20% | +25.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.24% | +25.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.42% | +14.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 18, 2016 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CATH vs QQQ Performance
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CATH returned +17.20% while QQQ returned +25.22%. Year to date, CATH is up 11.02% versus a gain of 16.19% for QQQ.
Over three years, CATH compounded at +20.24% per year against +25.47% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +11.42% and +14.34% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, CATH has the edge at +13.83% annualized vs +13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.6% for CATH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for CATH and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CATH charges 0.29% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $18 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CATH currently yields 0.77% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CATH and QQQ share 82 holdings out of 464 unique holdings combined, representing a 57.2% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CATH or QQQ?
CATH has an expense ratio of 0.29% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CATH or QQQ?
Over the past year CATH returned +17.20% vs +25.22% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CATH annualized +13.83% vs +13.01% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CATH or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.6% for CATH. Worst drawdown: CATH -34.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CATH and QQQ?
CATH and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between CATH and QQQ?
CATH and QQQ share 82 common holdings with a 57.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 464 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CATH or QQQ?
CATH yields 0.77% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so CATH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.