CATH vs VTI
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CATH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.77% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 447 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.02% | +13.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.20% | +20.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.24% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.42% | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 18, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
CATH vs VTI Performance
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CATH returned +17.20% while VTI returned +20.82%. Year to date, CATH is up 11.02% versus a gain of 13.12% for VTI.
Over three years, CATH compounded at +20.24% per year against +21.43% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.42% and +11.84% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, CATH has the edge at +13.83% annualized vs +8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CATH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for CATH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CATH charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CATH currently yields 0.77% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CATH and VTI share 413 holdings out of 2818 unique holdings combined, representing a 74.0% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CATH or VTI?
CATH has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CATH or VTI?
Over the past year CATH returned +17.20% vs +20.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CATH annualized +13.83% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CATH or VTI?
CATH has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CATH -34.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CATH and VTI?
CATH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between CATH and VTI?
CATH and VTI share 413 common holdings with a 74.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2818 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CATH or VTI?
CATH yields 0.77% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.