CATH vs VYM
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, CATH or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CATH led over 3Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y and 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CATH | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $1.4B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.75% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 446 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +10.81% | +13.91%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.46% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.90%Best | +18.12% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.43% | +12.17%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 14.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.0%Best | -35.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,180 | $17,758Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.5% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Apr 18, 2016 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 19, 2016 to Sep 11, 2026 (10.4 years).
CATH vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.4 years both funds cover.
CATH vs VYM Performance
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CATH returned +14.46% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, CATH is up 10.81% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Over three years, CATH compounded at +19.90% per year against +18.12% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.43% and +12.17% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, CATH has the edge at +13.74% annualized vs +10.07%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CATH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 14.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for CATH and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CATH charges 0.29% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $4 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CATH currently yields 0.75% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
33.5% of CATH's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 72.8% of VYM's money is in holdings CATH also owns.
Most of VYM is already inside CATH. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
221 positions in common, counted across the 444 positions we hold weights for in CATH and 603 in VYM, against full books of 446 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 349 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for CATH (24.9% of the fund), and 219 for CATH that do not appear in VYM (66.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CATH | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.13% | 7.29% | 4.16% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 1.64% | 3.38% | 1.74% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.96% | 2.36% | 1.40% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.77% | 2.01% | 1.24% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.76% | 1.93% | 1.17% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 0.70% | 1.56% | 0.86% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.71% | 1.42% | 0.71% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.53% | 1.46% | 0.93% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 0.54% | 1.28% | 0.74% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.97% | 0.75% | 0.22% |
72.8% of VYM is already inside CATH.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CATH or VYM?
CATH has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CATH or VYM?
Over the past year CATH returned +14.46% vs +17.57% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CATH annualized +13.74% vs +10.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CATH or VYM?
CATH has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 14.0% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CATH -34.0% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both CATH and VYM?
CATH and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CATH and VYM?
72.8% of VYM's money is in holdings CATH also owns. 72.8% of VYM's is in holdings CATH also owns. They hold 221 positions in common, counted across the 444 positions we hold weights for in CATH and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, CATH or VYM?
CATH yields 0.75% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than CATH?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CATH led over 3Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y and 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.