CGDV vs VOO
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. CGDV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGDV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $36.8B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.19% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 57 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +16.94% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.93% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.74% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CGDV vs VOO Performance
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGDV returned +27.93% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, CGDV is up 16.94% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, CGDV compounded at +24.74% per year against +21.47% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, CGDV has the edge at +19.60% annualized vs +13.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.8% for CGDV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGDV charges 0.33% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $3 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGDV currently yields 1.19% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
CGDV and VOO share 48 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 38.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGDV or VOO?
CGDV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGDV or VOO?
Over the past year CGDV returned +27.93% vs +22.62% for VOO, so CGDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), CGDV annualized +19.60% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGDV or VOO?
CGDV has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CGDV -21.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CGDV and VOO?
CGDV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between CGDV and VOO?
CGDV and VOO share 48 common holdings with a 38.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGDV or VOO?
CGDV yields 1.19% while VOO yields 1.09%, so CGDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.