CGFS vs QQQ

CGFS vs QQQ

Which is better, CGFS or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.8%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCGFSQQQ
Expense Ratio0.63%0.18%Best
AUM$107M$437.3B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.43%
Holdings733208
YTD Return-0.02%+12.98%Best
1Y Return-+11.59%
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.05%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.74%
Top 10 Weight53.8%46.9%Best
Fund FamilyCG Advisory ServicesInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionSep 16, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

CGFS vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

CGFS vs QQQ Performance

CG Flagship Equity ETF (CGFS) is an ETF from CG Advisory Services and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, CGFS is down 0.02% versus a gain of 12.98% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CGFS charges 0.63% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $63 vs $18 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGFS currently yields 0.00% against 0.43% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

CGFS already in QQQ24.6%
QQQ already in CGFS84.8%

24.6% of CGFS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 84.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings CGFS also owns.

Most of QQQ is already inside CGFS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

61 positions in common, counted across the 365 positions we hold weights for in CGFS and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 733 and 208.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 33 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for CGFS (12.3% of the fund), and 272 for CGFS that do not appear in QQQ (74.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CGFSWeight in QQQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp4.17%8.05%3.88%
AAPLApple Inc4.03%7.68%3.65%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp2.15%6.16%4.01%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.26%4.23%1.97%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc2.51%3.15%0.64%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.0.10%4.47%4.37%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.07%3.37%2.30%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc0.32%3.90%3.58%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C0.84%2.93%2.09%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.06%2.52%1.46%

84.8% of QQQ is already inside CGFS.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

CGFSQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CGFS or QQQ?

CGFS has an expense ratio of 0.63% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between CGFS and QQQ?

84.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings CGFS also owns. 84.8% of QQQ's is in holdings CGFS also owns. They hold 61 positions in common, counted across the 365 positions we hold weights for in CGFS and 101 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, CGFS or QQQ?

CGFS yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than CGFS?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.