CHRI vs VOO
Global X S&P 500 Christian Values ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CHRI or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CHRI | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.38% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 934 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +12.81% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.84% | +16.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.02% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.4% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,565 | $11,736Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.2% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 23, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 24, 2025 to Oct 2, 2026 (1 years).
CHRI vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
CHRI vs VOO Performance
Global X S&P 500 Christian Values ETF (CHRI) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CHRI returned +14.84% while VOO returned +16.33%. Year to date, CHRI is up 12.81% versus a gain of 13.59% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CHRI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 12.7% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.4% for CHRI and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CHRI charges 0.29% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CHRI currently yields 0.38% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
99.1% of CHRI's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 92.2% of VOO's money is in holdings CHRI also owns.
Most of CHRI is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, CHRI as of Sep 15, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
453 positions in common, counted across the 463 positions we hold weights for in CHRI and 494 in VOO, against full books of 934 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 40 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for CHRI (7.3% of the fund), and 8 for CHRI that do not appear in VOO (0.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CHRI | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.99% | 7.55% | 0.44% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.37% | 7.05% | 0.32% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.56% | 5.36% | 0.20% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.85% | 4.13% | 0.28% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.04% | 3.24% | 0.20% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.59% | 2.86% | 0.27% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.43% | 2.62% | 0.19% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.18% | 1.90% | 0.28% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.66% | 1.44% | 0.22% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.51% | 1.46% | 0.05% |
99.1% of CHRI is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CHRI or VOO?
CHRI has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CHRI or VOO?
Over the past year CHRI returned +14.84% vs +16.33% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CHRI annualized +15.65% vs +17.36% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CHRI or VOO?
CHRI has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 12.7% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CHRI -9.4% vs VOO -8.9%.
Should I hold both CHRI and VOO?
CHRI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CHRI and VOO?
99.1% of CHRI's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 92.2% of VOO's is in holdings CHRI also owns. They hold 453 positions in common, counted across the 463 positions we hold weights for in CHRI and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, CHRI or VOO?
CHRI yields 0.38% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than CHRI?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.