CHW vs VTI
Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CHW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CHW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.27% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $861M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.92% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 775 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +20.77% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.32% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.95% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.77% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -73.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Calamos Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
CHW vs VTI Performance
Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund (CHW) is a ETF from Calamos Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CHW returned +28.32% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, CHW is up 20.77% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, CHW compounded at +22.95% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.77% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -0.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CHW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.1% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.0% for CHW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CHW charges 2.27% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $227 vs $3 annually, a gap of $224 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CHW currently yields 5.92% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CHW and VTI share 172 holdings out of 3110 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CHW or VTI?
CHW has an expense ratio of 2.27% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $224 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CHW or VTI?
Over the past year CHW returned +28.32% vs +22.39% for VTI, so CHW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), CHW annualized -0.24% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CHW or VTI?
CHW has been the more volatile fund at 23.1% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CHW -73.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CHW and VTI?
CHW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CHW and VTI?
CHW and VTI share 172 common holdings with a 18.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3110 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CHW or VTI?
CHW yields 5.92% while VTI yields 1.07%, so CHW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.