CLCV vs QQQ
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, CLCV or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. CLCV led over 1Y, QQQ over the full window. CLCV is less concentrated, with 29.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLCV | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $17M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 54 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +15.68%Best | +15.21% |
| 1Y Return | +21.98%Best | +19.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.93% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.5%Best | 20.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -6.9%Best | -12.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $12,071 | $12,436Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.3%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Crossmark Global Investment | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 23, 2025 to Sep 16, 2026 (1.1 years).
CLCV vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
CLCV vs QQQ Performance
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) is an ETF from Crossmark Global Investment and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CLCV returned +21.98% while QQQ returned +19.78%. Year to date, CLCV is up 15.68% versus a gain of 15.21% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.7% compared with 9.5% for CLCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.9% for CLCV and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLCV charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLCV currently yields 0.34% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
31.5% of CLCV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 33.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings CLCV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in CLCV and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 54 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 81 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for CLCV (64.0% of the fund), and 33 for CLCV that do not appear in QQQ (59.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CLCV | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.63% | 7.27% | 3.64% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.95% | 5.76% | 2.81% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.91% | 4.67% | 0.76% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.14% | 4.43% | 3.29% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.92% | 2.10% | 0.82% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 0.98% | 3.36% | 2.38% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 2.69% | 0.72% | 1.97% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 2.14% | 0.70% | 1.44% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 2.00% | 0.81% | 1.19% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 1.84% | 0.73% | 1.11% |
33.5% of QQQ is already inside CLCV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLCV or QQQ?
CLCV has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CLCV or QQQ?
Over the past year CLCV returned +21.98% vs +19.78% for QQQ, so CLCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CLCV annualized +18.66% vs +21.92% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CLCV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.7% annualized versus 9.5% for CLCV. Worst drawdown: CLCV -6.9% vs QQQ -12.0%.
Should I hold both CLCV and QQQ?
CLCV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CLCV and QQQ?
33.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings CLCV also owns. 33.5% of QQQ's is in holdings CLCV also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in CLCV and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLCV or QQQ?
CLCV yields 0.34% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than CLCV?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. CLCV led over 1Y, QQQ over the full window. CLCV is less concentrated, with 29.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.