CLCV vs QQQ
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLCV | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $17M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.35% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +16.62% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.34% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Crossmark Global Investment | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CLCV vs QQQ Performance
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) is a ETF from Crossmark Global Investment and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CLCV returned +24.34% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, CLCV is up 16.62% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 9.2% for CLCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.9% for CLCV and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLCV charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLCV currently yields 0.35% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CLCV and QQQ share 16 holdings out of 140 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLCV or QQQ?
CLCV has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CLCV or QQQ?
Over the past year CLCV returned +24.34% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CLCV annualized +20.97% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CLCV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 9.2% for CLCV. Worst drawdown: CLCV -6.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CLCV and QQQ?
CLCV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CLCV and QQQ?
CLCV and QQQ share 16 common holdings with a 18.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 140 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLCV or QQQ?
CLCV yields 0.35% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.