CLCV vs VOO
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. CLCV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLCV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $17M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.35% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +17.96% | +12.73% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.88% | +20.59% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.87% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Crossmark Global Investment | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CLCV vs VOO Performance
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) is a ETF from Crossmark Global Investment and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CLCV returned +24.88% while VOO returned +20.59%. Year to date, CLCV is up 17.96% versus a gain of 12.73% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 9.3% for CLCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.9% for CLCV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLCV charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLCV currently yields 0.35% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
CLCV and VOO share 48 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLCV or VOO?
CLCV has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CLCV or VOO?
Over the past year CLCV returned +24.88% vs +20.59% for VOO, so CLCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CLCV annualized +21.95% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CLCV or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 9.3% for CLCV. Worst drawdown: CLCV -6.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CLCV and VOO?
CLCV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CLCV and VOO?
CLCV and VOO share 48 common holdings with a 22.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLCV or VOO?
CLCV yields 0.35% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.