DDM vs VTI
ProShares Ultra Dow30 vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, DDM or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DDM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DDM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $573M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 43 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +11.18% | +12.28%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.27%Best | +16.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.42%Best | +20.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.71%Best | +11.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.1% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -82.8% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,189Best | $17,576 |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 19, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 21, 2006 to Sep 17, 2026 (20.2 years).
DDM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20.2 years both funds cover.
DDM vs VTI Performance
ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DDM returned +21.27% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, DDM is up 11.18% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Over three years, DDM compounded at +24.42% per year against +20.89% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.71% and +11.94% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, DDM has the edge at +12.60% annualized vs +9.70%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DDM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.1% compared with 15.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.8% for DDM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DDM charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DDM currently yields 0.91% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 34.3% of VTI's money is in holdings DDM also owns.
Stated as a floor: for DDM, our book for it covers 82.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
30 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in DDM and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 43 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DDM | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.26% | 6.29% | 4.03% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.62% | 4.79% | 1.17% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.57% | 6.40% | 4.83% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 7.28% | 0.40% | 6.88% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 5.68% | 0.52% | 5.16% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.85% | 3.65% | 1.80% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.42% | 2.90% | 0.48% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.54% | 1.31% | 1.23% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.70% | 0.83% | 1.87% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 3.06% | 0.29% | 2.77% |
34.3% of VTI is already inside DDM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DDM or VTI?
DDM has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DDM or VTI?
Over the past year DDM returned +21.27% vs +16.78% for VTI, so DDM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), DDM annualized +12.60% vs +9.70% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DDM or VTI?
DDM has been the more volatile fund at 30.1% annualized versus 15.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DDM -82.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DDM and VTI?
DDM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DDM and VTI?
At least 34.3% of VTI's money is in holdings DDM also owns. Our book for DDM is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in DDM and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, DDM or VTI?
DDM yields 0.91% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than DDM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DDM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.