DDM vs VTI
ProShares Ultra Dow30 vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DDM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DDM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $565M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.93% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +19.12% | +13.86% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.49% | +20.74% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.46% | +21.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.19% | +11.90% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -82.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 19, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
DDM vs VTI Performance
ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DDM returned +32.49% while VTI returned +20.74%. Year to date, DDM is up 19.12% versus a gain of 13.86% for VTI.
Over three years, DDM compounded at +27.46% per year against +21.66% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.19% and +11.90% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, DDM has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DDM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.8% for DDM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DDM charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DDM currently yields 0.93% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DDM and VTI share 29 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DDM or VTI?
DDM has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DDM or VTI?
Over the past year DDM returned +32.49% vs +20.74% for VTI, so DDM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), DDM annualized +13.03% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DDM or VTI?
DDM has been the more volatile fund at 30.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DDM -82.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DDM and VTI?
DDM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between DDM and VTI?
DDM and VTI share 29 common holdings with a 21.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DDM or VTI?
DDM yields 0.93% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.