DIVD vs VOO
Altrius Global Dividend ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DIVD or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. DIVD led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. DIVD is less concentrated, with 23.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DIVD | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $24M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.08% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 65 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +17.58%Best | +13.37% |
| 1Y Return | +26.15%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.01% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 13.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.9%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $20,654 | $22,584Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.1%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Altrius Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2022 to Sep 4, 2026 (3.9 years).
DIVD vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
DIVD vs VOO Performance
Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD) is an ETF from Altrius Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DIVD returned +26.15% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, DIVD is up 17.58% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, DIVD compounded at +18.01% per year against +21.29% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +23.23% annualized vs +20.44%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DIVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.5% compared with 13.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.9% for DIVD and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DIVD charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DIVD currently yields 3.08% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
42.6% of DIVD's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 10.6% of VOO's money is in holdings DIVD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, DIVD as of Aug 18, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
35 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in DIVD and 505 in VOO, against full books of 65 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 462 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for DIVD (88.9% of the fund), and 14 for DIVD that do not appear in VOO (24.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DIVD | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.21% | 1.26% | 0.05% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.21% | 0.95% | 0.26% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.22% | 0.88% | 0.34% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn7 | 1.75% | 0.11% | 1.64% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.17% | 0.69% | 0.48% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 1.23% | 0.58% | 0.65% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.27% | 0.49% | 0.78% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.21% | 0.48% | 0.73% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.20% | 0.49% | 0.71% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 1.09% | 0.59% | 0.50% |
42.6% of DIVD is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DIVD or VOO?
DIVD has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DIVD or VOO?
Over the past year DIVD returned +26.15% vs +20.08% for VOO, so DIVD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DIVD annualized +20.44% vs +23.23% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DIVD or VOO?
DIVD has been the more volatile fund at 13.5% annualized versus 13.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: DIVD -13.9% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both DIVD and VOO?
DIVD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DIVD and VOO?
42.6% of DIVD's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 10.6% of VOO's is in holdings DIVD also owns. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in DIVD and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, DIVD or VOO?
DIVD yields 3.08% while VOO yields 1.08%, so DIVD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than DIVD?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. DIVD led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. DIVD is less concentrated, with 23.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.