DSI vs VOO
iShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DSI or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. DSI led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DSI | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5.4B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.84% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 407 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +12.41%Best | +11.48% |
| 1Y Return | +17.00%Best | +15.94% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.70% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.90% | +12.66%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.1%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,545 | $18,149Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.5% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 14, 2006 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 15, 2026 (16 years).
DSI vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
DSI vs VOO Performance
iShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF (DSI) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DSI returned +17.00% while VOO returned +15.94%. Year to date, DSI is up 12.41% versus a gain of 11.48% for VOO.
Over three years, DSI compounded at +20.70% per year against +21.01% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.90% and +12.66% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.34% annualized vs +13.33%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DSI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.1% for DSI and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DSI charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DSI currently yields 0.84% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
95.7% of DSI's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 52.4% of VOO's money is in holdings DSI also owns.
Most of DSI is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
268 positions in common, counted across the 400 positions we hold weights for in DSI and 494 in VOO, against full books of 407 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 222 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for DSI (47.0% of the fund), and 107 for DSI that do not appear in VOO (3.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DSI | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 14.08% | 7.55% | 6.53% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 9.93% | 5.36% | 4.57% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 5.53% | 3.24% | 2.29% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 4.35% | 2.62% | 1.73% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.92% | 1.36% | 1.56% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.13% | 1.21% | 0.92% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 1.75% | 0.93% | 0.82% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 1.33% | 0.72% | 0.61% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.26% | 0.69% | 0.57% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.21% | 0.71% | 0.50% |
95.7% of DSI is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DSI or VOO?
DSI has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DSI or VOO?
Over the past year DSI returned +17.00% vs +15.94% for VOO, so DSI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), DSI annualized +13.33% vs +13.34% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DSI or VOO?
DSI has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: DSI -34.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both DSI and VOO?
DSI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DSI and VOO?
95.7% of DSI's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 52.4% of VOO's is in holdings DSI also owns. They hold 268 positions in common, counted across the 400 positions we hold weights for in DSI and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, DSI or VOO?
DSI yields 0.84% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than DSI?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. DSI led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.