DSTL vs ECML
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF vs Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF
Which is better, DSTL or ECML?
Each has led over a different period.
DSTL has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 3Y, ECML over 1Y and the full window. DSTL is less concentrated, with 19.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 20.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DSTL | ECML |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $2.0B | $123M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 300 | 130 |
| YTD Return | +10.45% | +17.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.58% | +20.99%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.33%Best | +13.75% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.60% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3%Best | 18.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.9%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $15,659 | $16,017Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 19.9%Best | 20.6% |
| Fund Family | Distillate Capital Etfs | Euclidean Technologies |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2018 | May 18, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 18, 2023 to Oct 7, 2026 (3.4 years).
DSTL vs ECML growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
DSTL vs ECML Performance
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) is an ETF from Distillate Capital Etfs and Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is an ETF from Euclidean Technologies. Over the past year DSTL returned +12.58% while ECML returned +20.99%. Year to date, DSTL is up 10.45% versus a gain of 17.25% for ECML.
Over three years, DSTL compounded at +14.33% per year against +13.75% for ECML.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 14.3% for DSTL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for DSTL and -25.4% for ECML. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DSTL charges 0.39% per year while ECML charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $95 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DSTL currently yields 1.06% against 1.10% for ECML.
Holdings Overlap
13.4% of DSTL's money is in holdings ECML also owns. 20.5% of ECML's money is in holdings DSTL also owns.
ECML and DSTL share little of their money.
14 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 64 in ECML, against full books of 300 and 130.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 49 positions for ECML that do not appear in our book for DSTL (77.7% of the fund), and 85 for DSTL that do not appear in ECML (85.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DSTL | Weight in ECML | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 2.02% | 1.77% | 0.25% |
| EPAMEpam Systems, Inc. | 1.09% | 2.22% | 1.13% |
| MOAltria Group Inc. | 1.42% | 1.87% | 0.45% |
| FOXAFox Corp. Class A | 1.17% | 2.12% | 0.95% |
| THCTenet Healthcare Corp Common Stock Usd 0.05 | 1.14% | 1.60% | 0.46% |
| CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A | 1.39% | 1.33% | 0.06% |
| BWABorgWarner Inc | 0.63% | 1.98% | 1.35% |
| OCOwens Corning | 0.81% | 1.71% | 0.90% |
| CCKCrown Holdings Inc. | 0.62% | 1.59% | 0.97% |
| DHIDr Horton Inc. | 0.91% | 1.00% | 0.09% |
20.5% of ECML is already inside DSTL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DSTL or ECML?
DSTL has an expense ratio of 0.39% while ECML charges 0.95%. DSTL is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DSTL or ECML?
Over the past year DSTL returned +12.58% vs +20.99% for ECML, so ECML leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DSTL or ECML?
ECML has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 14.3% for DSTL. Worst drawdown: DSTL -16.9% vs ECML -25.4%.
Should I hold both DSTL and ECML?
DSTL and ECML have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DSTL and ECML?
20.5% of ECML's money is in holdings DSTL also owns. 20.5% of ECML's is in holdings DSTL also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 64 in ECML.
Which pays a higher dividend, DSTL or ECML?
DSTL yields 1.06% while ECML yields 1.10%, so ECML currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ECML better than DSTL?
DSTL has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 3Y, ECML over 1Y and the full window. DSTL is less concentrated, with 19.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 20.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.