DSTL vs VOO
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DSTL or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DSTL is less concentrated, with 20.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DSTL | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.1B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 101 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +14.60%Best | +11.01% |
| 1Y Return | +18.41%Best | +15.60% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.24% | +20.82%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.18% | +12.60%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 16.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.1%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,988 | $18,101Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.1%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Distillate Capital Etfs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2018 to Sep 16, 2026 (7.9 years).
DSTL vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.
DSTL vs VOO Performance
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) is an ETF from Distillate Capital Etfs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DSTL returned +18.41% while VOO returned +15.60%. Year to date, DSTL is up 14.60% versus a gain of 11.01% for VOO.
Over three years, DSTL compounded at +15.24% per year against +20.82% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.18% and +12.60% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +15.28% annualized vs +14.70%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DSTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 16.7% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for DSTL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DSTL charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DSTL currently yields 1.06% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
77.9% of DSTL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 7.1% of VOO's money is in holdings DSTL also owns.
Most of DSTL is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
70 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 494 in VOO, against full books of 101 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 417 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for DSTL (92.0% of the fund), and 28 for DSTL that do not appear in VOO (21.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DSTL | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 3.21% | 0.23% | 2.98% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 2.64% | 0.50% | 2.14% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.82% | 0.69% | 1.13% |
| ACNAccenture Plc | 2.34% | 0.16% | 2.18% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 1.98% | 0.13% | 1.85% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 1.89% | 0.14% | 1.75% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 1.62% | 0.22% | 1.40% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 1.64% | 0.16% | 1.48% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 1.49% | 0.23% | 1.26% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 1.11% | 0.58% | 0.53% |
77.9% of DSTL is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DSTL or VOO?
DSTL has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DSTL or VOO?
Over the past year DSTL returned +18.41% vs +15.60% for VOO, so DSTL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DSTL annualized +14.70% vs +15.28% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DSTL or VOO?
DSTL has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 16.7% for VOO. Worst drawdown: DSTL -33.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both DSTL and VOO?
DSTL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DSTL and VOO?
77.9% of DSTL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 7.1% of VOO's is in holdings DSTL also owns. They hold 70 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, DSTL or VOO?
DSTL yields 1.06% while VOO yields 1.04%, so DSTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than DSTL?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DSTL is less concentrated, with 20.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.