DSTL vs IVV
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DSTL or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DSTL is less concentrated, with 20.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DSTL | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.1B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 101 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +14.60%Best | +11.03% |
| 1Y Return | +18.41%Best | +15.62% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.24% | +20.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.18% | +12.61%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 16.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.1%Best | -33.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,988 | $18,109Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.1%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Distillate Capital Etfs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2018 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2018 to Sep 16, 2026 (7.9 years).
DSTL vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.
DSTL vs IVV Performance
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) is an ETF from Distillate Capital Etfs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DSTL returned +18.41% while IVV returned +15.62%. Year to date, DSTL is up 14.60% versus a gain of 11.03% for IVV.
Over three years, DSTL compounded at +15.24% per year against +20.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.18% and +12.61% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +15.23% annualized vs +14.70%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DSTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 16.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for DSTL and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DSTL charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DSTL currently yields 1.06% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
75.0% of DSTL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 7.2% of IVV's money is in holdings DSTL also owns.
Most of DSTL is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
68 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 490 in IVV, against full books of 101 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 414 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DSTL (91.5% of the fund), and 30 for DSTL that do not appear in IVV (24.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DSTL | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 3.21% | 0.32% | 2.89% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 2.64% | 0.55% | 2.09% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.82% | 0.68% | 1.14% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 1.98% | 0.14% | 1.84% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 1.89% | 0.16% | 1.73% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 1.62% | 0.23% | 1.39% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 1.64% | 0.18% | 1.46% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 1.49% | 0.23% | 1.26% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 1.11% | 0.53% | 0.58% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.44% | 0.17% | 1.27% |
75.0% of DSTL is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DSTL or IVV?
DSTL has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DSTL or IVV?
Over the past year DSTL returned +18.41% vs +15.62% for IVV, so DSTL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DSTL annualized +14.70% vs +15.23% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DSTL or IVV?
DSTL has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 16.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DSTL -33.1% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both DSTL and IVV?
DSTL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DSTL and IVV?
75.0% of DSTL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 7.2% of IVV's is in holdings DSTL also owns. They hold 68 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DSTL or IVV?
DSTL yields 1.06% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DSTL?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DSTL is less concentrated, with 20.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.