DSTL vs IVV
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DSTL delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DSTL | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.1B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.13% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 101 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +19.38% | +13.51% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.41% | +20.65% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.57% | +21.94% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.76% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Distillate Capital Etfs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2018 | May 15, 2000 |
DSTL vs IVV Performance
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) is a ETF from Distillate Capital Etfs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DSTL returned +23.41% while IVV returned +20.65%. Year to date, DSTL is up 19.38% versus a gain of 13.51% for IVV.
Over three years, DSTL compounded at +16.57% per year against +21.94% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.76% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, DSTL has the edge at +15.41% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DSTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for DSTL and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DSTL charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DSTL currently yields 1.13% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DSTL and IVV share 71 holdings out of 534 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DSTL or IVV?
DSTL has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DSTL or IVV?
Over the past year DSTL returned +23.41% vs +20.65% for IVV, so DSTL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DSTL annualized +15.41% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DSTL or IVV?
DSTL has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DSTL -33.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DSTL and IVV?
DSTL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DSTL and IVV?
DSTL and IVV share 71 common holdings with a 6.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 534 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DSTL or IVV?
DSTL yields 1.13% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DSTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.