DYLG vs IVV
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DYLG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 9.26% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +10.24% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.50% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.85% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 25, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
DYLG vs IVV Performance
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DYLG returned +19.50% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, DYLG is up 10.24% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, DYLG compounded at +14.85% per year against +22.08% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, DYLG has the edge at +13.53% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.3% for DYLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.2% for DYLG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DYLG charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DYLG currently yields 9.26% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DYLG and IVV share 19 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 14.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DYLG or IVV?
DYLG has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DYLG or IVV?
Over the past year DYLG returned +19.50% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), DYLG annualized +13.53% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DYLG or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.3% for DYLG. Worst drawdown: DYLG -14.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DYLG and IVV?
DYLG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DYLG and IVV?
DYLG and IVV share 19 common holdings with a 14.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DYLG or IVV?
DYLG yields 9.26% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.