EMLP vs IVV

EMLP vs IVV

Which is better, EMLP or IVV?

Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. EMLP led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, IVV over the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEMLPIVV
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%Best
AUM$4.2B$886.7B
Dividend Yield2.76%1.10%
Holdings116508
YTD Return+17.09%Best+13.39%
1Y Return+20.56%Best+20.08%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.40%Best+21.29%
5Y Return (annualized)+16.23%Best+12.88%
Volatility (annualized)15.2%14.1%Best
Max Drawdown-48.0%-33.9%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$21,212Best$18,327
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 20, 2012May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 21, 2012 to Sep 4, 2026 (14.2 years).

EMLP vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.2 years both funds cover.

EMLP vs IVV Performance

First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EMLP returned +20.56% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, EMLP is up 17.09% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.

Over three years, EMLP compounded at +21.40% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +16.23% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.81% annualized vs +7.21%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EMLP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 14.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.0% for EMLP and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EMLP charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMLP currently yields 2.76% against 1.10% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in EMLP2.2%

At least 2.2% of IVV's money is in holdings EMLP also owns.

Stated as a floor: for EMLP, our book for it covers 90.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

IVV and EMLP share little of their money.

30 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in EMLP and 505 in IVV, against full books of 116 and 508.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in EMLPWeight in IVVDifference
KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de3.60%0.09%3.51%
SOSouthern Co.2.65%0.16%2.49%
PPLPpl Corp (Utilities)2.62%0.04%2.58%
OKEOneok, Inc.2.19%0.08%2.11%
ETREntergy Corp.2.14%0.07%2.07%
DUKDuke Energy Corp2.05%0.14%1.91%
SRESempra Common Stock1.80%0.08%1.72%
AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc1.65%0.10%1.55%
PEGPublic Service Enterprise Group Incorporated1.55%0.06%1.49%
EVRGEvergy Inc.1.57%0.03%1.54%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of EMLP and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

EMLPIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EMLP or IVV?

EMLP has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, EMLP or IVV?

Over the past year EMLP returned +20.56% vs +20.08% for IVV, so EMLP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), EMLP annualized +7.21% vs +13.81% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, EMLP or IVV?

EMLP has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 14.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EMLP -48.0% vs IVV -33.9%.

Should I hold both EMLP and IVV?

EMLP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between EMLP and IVV?

At least 2.2% of IVV's money is in holdings EMLP also owns. Our book for EMLP is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in EMLP and 505 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, EMLP or IVV?

EMLP yields 2.76% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EMLP currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than EMLP?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. EMLP led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, IVV over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.