EMOT vs IVV
First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EMOT or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. EMOT is less concentrated, with 23.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMOT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 102 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +10.01% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.71% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.5%Best | 11.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.4%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $13,200 | $14,267Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.7%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 26, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.2 years).
EMOT vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
EMOT vs IVV Performance
First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF (EMOT) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EMOT returned +9.71% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, EMOT is up 10.01% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 11.5% for EMOT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for EMOT and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMOT charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMOT currently yields 1.06% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
98.1% of EMOT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 42.5% of IVV's money is in holdings EMOT also owns.
Most of EMOT is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in EMOT and 490 in IVV, against full books of 102 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 433 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EMOT (56.1% of the fund), and 1 for EMOT that do not appear in IVV (1.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMOT | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.11% | 8.07% | 5.96% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.09% | 7.02% | 4.93% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.44% | 5.69% | 3.25% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.10% | 3.84% | 1.74% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.91% | 2.65% | 0.74% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 1.83% | 2.39% | 0.56% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.93% | 1.90% | 0.03% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.97% | 1.38% | 0.59% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.25% | 0.95% | 1.30% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.31% | 0.72% | 1.59% |
98.1% of EMOT is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMOT or IVV?
EMOT has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMOT or IVV?
Over the past year EMOT returned +9.71% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EMOT annualized +13.45% vs +17.53% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMOT or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 11.5% for EMOT. Worst drawdown: EMOT -16.4% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both EMOT and IVV?
EMOT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EMOT and IVV?
98.1% of EMOT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 42.5% of IVV's is in holdings EMOT also owns. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in EMOT and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMOT or IVV?
EMOT yields 1.06% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EMOT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. EMOT is less concentrated, with 23.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.