EMOT vs VOO
First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMOT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +15.84% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.93% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 26, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EMOT vs VOO Performance
First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF (EMOT) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMOT returned +19.93% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, EMOT is up 15.84% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 11.3% for EMOT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for EMOT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMOT charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMOT currently yields 1.08% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EMOT and VOO share 50 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMOT or VOO?
EMOT has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMOT or VOO?
Over the past year EMOT returned +19.93% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EMOT annualized +16.96% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMOT or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 11.3% for EMOT. Worst drawdown: EMOT -16.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EMOT and VOO?
EMOT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMOT and VOO?
EMOT and VOO share 50 common holdings with a 25.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMOT or VOO?
EMOT yields 1.08% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.