ENHU vs LCTU
iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF vs iShares US Carbon Transition Readiness Aware Active ETF
Which is better, ENHU or LCTU?
Nearly the same fund. LCTU costs less.
LCTU has a lower expense ratio. ENHU led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. LCTU is less concentrated, with 35.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ENHU | LCTU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.22% | 0.15%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.74% | 0.96% |
| Holdings | 708 | 659 |
| YTD Return | +12.31%Best | +10.02% |
| 1Y Return | +12.94%Best | +9.86% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.13% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.0%Best | -9.4% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,366Best | $11,055 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.2% | 35.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 4, 2025 | Apr 6, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 5, 2025 to Nov 12, 2026 (1 years).
ENHU vs LCTU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
ENHU vs LCTU Performance
iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares US Carbon Transition Readiness Aware Active ETF (LCTU) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ENHU returned +12.94% while LCTU returned +9.86%. Year to date, ENHU is up 12.31% versus a gain of 10.02% for LCTU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ENHU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 12.7% for LCTU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.0% for ENHU and -9.4% for LCTU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ENHU charges 0.22% per year while LCTU charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $22 vs $15 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ENHU currently yields 0.74% against 0.96% for LCTU.
Holdings Overlap
79.4% of ENHU's money is in holdings LCTU also owns. 78.9% of LCTU's money is in holdings ENHU also owns.
Most of ENHU is already inside LCTU. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
173 positions in common, counted across the 351 positions we hold weights for in ENHU and 322 in LCTU, against full books of 708 and 659.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 132 positions for LCTU that do not appear in our book for ENHU (20.3% of the fund), and 162 for ENHU that do not appear in LCTU (19.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ENHU | Weight in LCTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.43% | 7.73% | 0.30% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 7.26% | 7.36% | 0.10% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.14% | 5.17% | 0.97% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.90% | 3.12% | 0.78% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.07% | 2.48% | 0.59% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.46% | 2.40% | 0.06% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.55% | 1.90% | 0.65% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.35% | 1.99% | 0.36% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.58% | 1.44% | 0.14% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 1.47% | 1.38% | 0.09% |
79.4% of ENHU is already inside LCTU.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ENHU or LCTU?
ENHU has an expense ratio of 0.22% while LCTU charges 0.15%. LCTU is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ENHU or LCTU?
Over the past year ENHU returned +12.94% vs +9.86% for LCTU, so ENHU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ENHU annualized +13.66% vs +10.55% for LCTU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ENHU or LCTU?
ENHU has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 12.7% for LCTU. Worst drawdown: ENHU -9.0% vs LCTU -9.4%.
Should I hold both ENHU and LCTU?
ENHU and LCTU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ENHU and LCTU?
79.4% of ENHU's money is in holdings LCTU also owns. 78.9% of LCTU's is in holdings ENHU also owns. They hold 173 positions in common, counted across the 351 positions we hold weights for in ENHU and 322 in LCTU.
Which pays a higher dividend, ENHU or LCTU?
ENHU yields 0.74% while LCTU yields 0.96%, so LCTU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LCTU better than ENHU?
LCTU has a lower expense ratio. ENHU led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. LCTU is less concentrated, with 35.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.