EPS vs IVV
WisdomTree US LargeCap Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EPS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EPS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.15% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 502 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +14.99% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.81% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.90% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.01% | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
EPS vs IVV Performance
WisdomTree US LargeCap Fund (EPS) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EPS returned +25.81% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, EPS is up 14.99% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, EPS compounded at +20.90% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.01% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, EPS has the edge at +8.97% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EPS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.6% for EPS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EPS charges 0.08% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EPS currently yields 1.15% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EPS and IVV share 382 holdings out of 617 unique holdings combined, representing a 71.0% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EPS or IVV?
EPS has an expense ratio of 0.08% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EPS or IVV?
Over the past year EPS returned +25.81% vs +23.70% for IVV, so EPS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), EPS annualized +8.97% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EPS or IVV?
EPS has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EPS -55.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EPS and IVV?
EPS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between EPS and IVV?
EPS and IVV share 382 common holdings with a 71.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 617 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EPS or IVV?
EPS yields 1.15% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EPS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.