EPS vs IVV
WisdomTree US LargeCap Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EPS or IVV?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EPS led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EPS | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.7B | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.14% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 506 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +15.17%Best | +13.39% |
| 1Y Return | +21.52%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.09% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.71% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4%Best | 15.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -55.6%Best | -56.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,189 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.1% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 23, 2007 to Sep 4, 2026 (19.5 years).
EPS vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.5 years both funds cover.
EPS vs IVV Performance
WisdomTree US LargeCap Fund (EPS) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EPS returned +21.52% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, EPS is up 15.17% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, EPS compounded at +21.09% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.71% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.36% annualized vs +8.94%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 15.4% for EPS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.6% for EPS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EPS charges 0.08% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EPS currently yields 1.14% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
95.9% of EPS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 91.2% of IVV's money is in holdings EPS also owns.
Most of EPS is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
391 positions in common, counted across the 502 positions we hold weights for in EPS and 504 in IVV, against full books of 506 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 102 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EPS (8.2% of the fund), and 84 for EPS that do not appear in IVV (3.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EPS | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.38% | 7.98% | 0.60% |
| AAPLApple Inc Ord | 5.19% | 6.86% | 1.67% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.37% | 4.01% | 2.36% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 4.42% | 5.44% | 1.02% |
| GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A | 5.96% | 3.19% | 2.77% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.91% | 1.94% | 0.97% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.65% | 2.98% | 1.33% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 2.18% | 1.45% | 0.73% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway, Inc., Class B | 1.72% | 1.43% | 0.29% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.33% | 1.51% | 0.18% |
95.9% of EPS is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EPS or IVV?
EPS has an expense ratio of 0.08% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EPS or IVV?
Over the past year EPS returned +21.52% vs +20.08% for IVV, so EPS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), EPS annualized +8.94% vs +9.36% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EPS or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 15.4% for EPS. Worst drawdown: EPS -55.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EPS and IVV?
EPS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EPS and IVV?
95.9% of EPS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 91.2% of IVV's is in holdings EPS also owns. They hold 391 positions in common, counted across the 502 positions we hold weights for in EPS and 504 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, EPS or IVV?
EPS yields 1.14% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EPS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EPS?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EPS led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.