EPS vs QQQ
WisdomTree US LargeCap Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EPS or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
EPS has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EPS is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EPS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $1.7B | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.14% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 506 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +15.17% | +17.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.52% | +25.59%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.09% | +24.63%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.71% | +14.18%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4%Best | 18.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -55.6% | -53.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,189 | $19,407Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.1%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2007 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 23, 2007 to Sep 4, 2026 (19.5 years).
EPS vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.5 years both funds cover.
EPS vs QQQ Performance
WisdomTree US LargeCap Fund (EPS) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EPS returned +21.52% while QQQ returned +25.59%. Year to date, EPS is up 15.17% versus a gain of 17.54% for QQQ.
Over three years, EPS compounded at +21.09% per year against +24.63% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +12.71% and +14.18% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +15.40% annualized vs +8.94%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 15.4% for EPS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.6% for EPS and -53.5% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EPS charges 0.08% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $18 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EPS currently yields 1.14% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
49.4% of EPS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 89.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings EPS also owns.
Most of QQQ is already inside EPS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
78 positions in common, counted across the 502 positions we hold weights for in EPS and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 506 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 16 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for EPS (7.5% of the fund), and 397 for EPS that do not appear in QQQ (49.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EPS | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.38% | 8.44% | 1.06% |
| AAPLApple Inc Ord | 5.19% | 7.27% | 2.08% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.37% | 4.67% | 1.70% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 4.42% | 5.76% | 1.34% |
| GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A | 5.96% | 3.36% | 2.60% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.33% | 4.43% | 3.10% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.91% | 2.78% | 0.13% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.65% | 3.16% | 1.51% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 0.54% | 3.45% | 2.91% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 0.52% | 2.56% | 2.04% |
89.3% of QQQ is already inside EPS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EPS or QQQ?
EPS has an expense ratio of 0.08% while QQQ charges 0.18%. EPS is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EPS or QQQ?
Over the past year EPS returned +21.52% vs +25.59% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), EPS annualized +8.94% vs +15.40% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EPS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 15.4% for EPS. Worst drawdown: EPS -55.6% vs QQQ -53.5%.
Should I hold both EPS and QQQ?
EPS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EPS and QQQ?
89.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings EPS also owns. 89.3% of QQQ's is in holdings EPS also owns. They hold 78 positions in common, counted across the 502 positions we hold weights for in EPS and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, EPS or QQQ?
EPS yields 1.14% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EPS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EPS?
EPS has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EPS is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.