EQTY vs JUDO

EQTY vs JUDO

Which is better, EQTY or JUDO?

JUDO costs less.

JUDO has a lower expense ratio. JUDO is less concentrated, with 42.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.9%.

Lower Fees: JUDOLess Concentrated: JUDO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEQTYJUDO
Expense Ratio0.99%0.55%Best
AUM$1.4B$7M
Dividend Yield0.02%3.37%
Holdings77256
YTD Return+12.60%Best+10.87%
1Y Return+16.37%-
3Y Return (annualized)+19.06%-
Top 10 Weight42.9%42.1%Best
Fund FamilyKovitz Investment GroupJanus Henderson Investors
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 28, 2011Mar 24, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

EQTY vs JUDO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare EQTY against instead:EQTY vs SPYEQTY vs QQQEQTY vs VOOEQTY vs VTIJUDO against:JUDO vs VXUS

EQTY vs JUDO Performance

Kovitz Core Equity ETF (EQTY) is an ETF from Kovitz Investment Group and Janus Henderson US Equity Enhanced Income ETF (JUDO) is an ETF from Janus Henderson Investors. Year to date, EQTY is up 12.60% versus a gain of 10.87% for JUDO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EQTY charges 0.99% per year while JUDO charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $55 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EQTY currently yields 0.02% against 3.37% for JUDO.

Holdings Overlap

EQTY already in JUDO45.3%
JUDO already in EQTY32.8%

45.3% of EQTY's money is in holdings JUDO also owns. 32.8% of JUDO's money is in holdings EQTY also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

14 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in EQTY and 70 in JUDO, against full books of 77 and 256.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 56 positions for JUDO that do not appear in our book for EQTY (66.8% of the fund), and 22 for EQTY that do not appear in JUDO (48.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in EQTYWeight in JUDODifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.24%6.91%1.67%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C3.96%6.05%2.09%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.14%4.14%1.00%
VVisa Inc Class A4.89%1.59%3.30%
AAPLApple Inc1.72%4.62%2.90%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.4.17%1.43%2.74%
ICEInterContinental Hotels Group PLC Ord Gbp0.2085213034.29%0.78%3.51%
DHRDanaher Corporation3.74%0.96%2.78%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.22%1.02%2.20%
MSIMotorola Solutions, Inc3.21%0.74%2.47%

45.3% of EQTY is already inside JUDO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

EQTYJUDO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EQTY or JUDO?

EQTY has an expense ratio of 0.99% while JUDO charges 0.55%. JUDO is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between EQTY and JUDO?

45.3% of EQTY's money is in holdings JUDO also owns. 32.8% of JUDO's is in holdings EQTY also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in EQTY and 70 in JUDO.

Which pays a higher dividend, EQTY or JUDO?

EQTY yields 0.02% while JUDO yields 3.37%, so JUDO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JUDO better than EQTY?

JUDO has a lower expense ratio. JUDO is less concentrated, with 42.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.