EUSA vs VOO
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EUSA or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. EUSA is less concentrated, with 2.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EUSA | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.9B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.42% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 534 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +9.51% | +11.01%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.25% | +15.60%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.11% | +20.82%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.19% | +12.60%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.2% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,150 | $18,101Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 2.3%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 5, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 13, 2010 to Sep 16, 2026 (16 years).
EUSA vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
EUSA vs VOO Performance
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EUSA returned +12.25% while VOO returned +15.60%. Year to date, EUSA is up 9.51% versus a gain of 11.01% for VOO.
Over three years, EUSA compounded at +15.11% per year against +20.82% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.19% and +12.60% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.30% annualized vs +10.77%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EUSA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.2% for EUSA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EUSA charges 0.09% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EUSA currently yields 1.42% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
80.4% of EUSA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 95.1% of VOO's money is in holdings EUSA also owns.
Most of VOO is already inside EUSA. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
413 positions in common, counted across the 495 positions we hold weights for in EUSA and 494 in VOO, against full books of 534 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 78 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for EUSA (4.3% of the fund), and 72 for EUSA that do not appear in VOO (13.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EUSA | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.20% | 7.55% | 7.35% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.20% | 7.05% | 6.85% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 0.21% | 5.36% | 5.15% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.19% | 4.13% | 3.94% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 0.11% | 3.24% | 3.13% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.20% | 2.86% | 2.66% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 0.09% | 2.62% | 2.53% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.21% | 1.90% | 1.69% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.20% | 1.46% | 1.26% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.20% | 1.44% | 1.24% |
95.1% of VOO is already inside EUSA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EUSA or VOO?
EUSA has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EUSA or VOO?
Over the past year EUSA returned +12.25% vs +15.60% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EUSA annualized +10.77% vs +13.30% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EUSA or VOO?
EUSA has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EUSA -39.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EUSA and VOO?
EUSA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EUSA and VOO?
95.1% of VOO's money is in holdings EUSA also owns. 95.1% of VOO's is in holdings EUSA also owns. They hold 413 positions in common, counted across the 495 positions we hold weights for in EUSA and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, EUSA or VOO?
EUSA yields 1.42% while VOO yields 1.04%, so EUSA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than EUSA?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. EUSA is less concentrated, with 2.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.