EXG vs VTI
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EXG or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EXG is less concentrated, with 29.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EXG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3.2B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.33% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 115 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +4.93% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.95% | +15.23%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.79% | +22.50%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.61% | +12.31%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7% | 15.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -76.1% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,430 | $17,869Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.8%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Eaton Vance | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 27, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 23, 2007 to Oct 1, 2026 (19.6 years).
EXG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.6 years both funds cover.
EXG vs VTI Performance
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) is an ETF from Eaton Vance and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EXG returned +10.95% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, EXG is up 4.93% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.
Over three years, EXG compounded at +18.79% per year against +22.50% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.61% and +12.31% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.19% annualized vs -1.33%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 15.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.1% for EXG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EXG charges 1.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EXG currently yields 7.33% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
54.3% of EXG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 33.7% of VTI's money is in holdings EXG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 154 days apart, EXG as of Feb 27, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
46 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in EXG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 115 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,104 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for EXG (63.8% of the fund), and 2 for EXG that do not appear in VTI (1.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EXG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.68% | 6.40% | 2.72% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.02% | 6.29% | 3.27% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.73% | 4.79% | 1.06% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 5.45% | 2.31% | 3.14% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.30% | 3.65% | 0.35% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.52% | 2.56% | 1.04% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.66% | 1.35% | 0.31% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.62% | 0.89% | 0.73% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.15% | 1.29% | 0.14% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 1.39% | 0.83% | 0.56% |
54.3% of EXG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EXG or VTI?
EXG has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EXG or VTI?
Over the past year EXG returned +10.95% vs +15.23% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), EXG annualized -1.33% vs +9.19% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EXG or VTI?
EXG has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 15.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EXG -76.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EXG and VTI?
EXG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EXG and VTI?
54.3% of EXG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 33.7% of VTI's is in holdings EXG also owns. They hold 46 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in EXG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, EXG or VTI?
EXG yields 7.33% while VTI yields 1.03%, so EXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EXG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EXG is less concentrated, with 29.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.