FBCG vs FELG

FBCG vs FELG

Which is better, FBCG or FELG?

Nearly the same fund. FELG costs less.

FELG has a lower expense ratio. FBCG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. FBCG is less concentrated, with 57.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.9%.

Lower Fees: FELGHigher Returns: FBCGLess Concentrated: FBCG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFBCGFELG
Expense Ratio0.57%0.18%Best
AUM$7.3B$5.4B
Dividend Yield0.03%0.37%
Holdings247267
YTD Return+5.97%Best+0.40%
1Y Return+5.87%Best-1.12%
3Y Return (annualized)+23.99%Best+18.91%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.41%-
Volatility (annualized)19.1%16.1%Best
Max Drawdown-27.9%-23.9%Best
$10,000 over 3 years$18,441Best$16,813
Top 10 Weight57.5%Best58.9%
Fund FamilyFidelity Investments (US)Fidelity Investments (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJun 2, 2020Nov 20, 2023

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 20, 2023 to Nov 11, 2026 (3 years).

FBCG vs FELG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.

Compare FBCG against instead:FBCG vs SPYFBCG vs QQQFBCG vs VOOFBCG vs VTIFELG against:FELG vs VXUS

FBCG vs FELG Performance

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year FBCG returned +5.87% while FELG returned -1.12%. Year to date, FBCG is up 5.97% versus a gain of 0.40% for FELG.

Over three years, FBCG compounded at +23.99% per year against +18.91% for FELG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FBCG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 16.1% for FELG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.9% for FBCG and -23.9% for FELG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FBCG charges 0.57% per year while FELG charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $18 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBCG currently yields 0.03% against 0.37% for FELG.

Holdings Overlap

FBCG already in FELG75.6%
FELG already in FBCG83.5%

75.6% of FBCG's money is in holdings FELG also owns. 83.5% of FELG's money is in holdings FBCG also owns.

Most of FELG is already inside FBCG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, FBCG as of Aug 31, 2026 and FELG as of Oct 16, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

58 positions in common, counted across the 200 positions we hold weights for in FBCG and 129 in FELG, against full books of 247 and 267.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 56 positions for FELG that do not appear in our book for FBCG (16.2% of the fund), and 123 for FBCG that do not appear in FELG (20.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FBCGWeight in FELGDifference
NVDANvidia Corp15.68%15.59%0.09%
AAPLApple Inc9.22%8.65%0.57%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc8.64%7.76%0.88%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.56%5.37%0.19%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.11%4.85%0.74%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.42%3.89%1.47%
LLYEli Lilly & Co2.65%3.59%0.94%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.37%3.45%1.08%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.97%0.55%4.42%
TSLATesla Inc1.47%2.64%1.17%

83.5% of FELG is already inside FBCG.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FBCGFELG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FBCG or FELG?

FBCG has an expense ratio of 0.57% while FELG charges 0.18%. FELG is the cheaper option, by $39 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FBCG or FELG?

Over the past year FBCG returned +5.87% vs -1.12% for FELG, so FBCG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FBCG or FELG?

FBCG has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 16.1% for FELG. Worst drawdown: FBCG -27.9% vs FELG -23.9%.

Should I hold both FBCG and FELG?

FBCG and FELG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between FBCG and FELG?

83.5% of FELG's money is in holdings FBCG also owns. 83.5% of FELG's is in holdings FBCG also owns. They hold 58 positions in common, counted across the 200 positions we hold weights for in FBCG and 129 in FELG.

Which pays a higher dividend, FBCG or FELG?

FBCG yields 0.03% while FELG yields 0.37%, so FELG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FELG better than FBCG?

FELG has a lower expense ratio. FBCG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. FBCG is less concentrated, with 57.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.